![]() Overall, successful ablation rate was significantly higher using RMN as compared with manual ablation (91 vs. Among these patients, 22 (43Â %) underwent repeat ablation with the RMN and 29 (57Â %) underwent repeat ablation with a manual ablation. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, including the successful ablation site and findings at electrophysiology study, in repeat procedures conducted using RMN as compared with manual ablation. Among 235 patients with idiopathic VA referred for catheter ablation, we identified 51 patients who were referred for repeat ablation after a failed manual ablation. We describe the efficacy of the RMN for ablation of idiopathic VA after failed manual ablation. The remote magnetic navigation (RMN) catheter has a flexible catheter design allowing access to difficult anatomy. Kawamura, Mitsuharu Scheinman, Melvin M Tseng, Zian H Lee, Byron K Marcus, Gregory M Badhwar, NitishĬatheter ablation for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is effective and safe, but efficacy is frequently limited due to an epicardial origin and difficult anatomy. Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2023
Categories |